
It seems that family man Obama really isn't a fan of the
City of Sin.
For the second time in less than a year, the President has slammed Vegas during
a town hall meeting.
"This isn't how responsible families do
their budgets. When times are tough, you tighten your belts," Obama said
at a New Hampshire
forum on February 2nd. "You don't go buying a boat when you can
barely pay your mortgage. You don't blow a bunch of cash in Vegas when you're
trying to save for college. You prioritize. You make tough choices. And it's
time your government did the same."
As soon as his comments reached Las Vegas, the President
became the receiver of outrage and harsh criticism from locals and politicians
alike. Obama immediately responded by sending a letter to Sen. Harry Reid which
read,
"I hope you know that during my Town Hall
today, I wasn't saying anything negative about Las Vegas. I was making the simple point that
families use vacation dollars, not college tuition money, to have fun. There is
no better place to have fun than Vegas, one of our country's great
destinations. I have always enjoyed my visits, look forward to visiting in a
few weeks, and hope folks will visit in record numbers this year."
Not much of an apology, if you ask me. Las
Vegas Mayor Oscar Goodman wasn't so easily sedated either.
Last spring's
similar attack on Las Vegas, when Obama urged corporations using federal
bailout money not to go to Vegas, was still quite fresh on the Mayor's
mind when he held a press conference later on that Tuesday.
A red-faced Goodman blasted the President,
calling him "no friend of Vegas" and declaring that he had became "incredulous"
when he had heard that Obama had once again insulted the city, insisting that this
time, no simple apology was enough to warrant forgiveness.
"It has to be a real mea culpa and a promise not to do it
again," Goodman said.
"You don't cite Las
Vegas as the specific example each time you're talking
about spending money. That's what I'm saying," Goodman blazed. "You
could tell people they should save their money to send their kids to college.
There's nothing wrong with that. And that's the end of the statement. You don't
need 'and blow your money in Las Vegas.'"
His comment last year advising corporations to stay away from Vegas
was followed by a huge drop in the city's convention business.
"I can't attribute the 341 lost meetings
just to the president's comments. But I'll tell you one thing: He sure doesn't
help us," Goodman said.
Las Vegas locals and politicians worry what the backlash of the President's
most recent comments will be and find his disregard of Vegas intolerable.
Reid released a statement to Obama Tuesday
afternoon, pleading with him to leave Vegas alone.
"I just spoke to the White House and told them
that while the president is correct that people saving for college need to be
fiscally responsible, the president needs to lay off Las Vegas and stop making
it the poster child for where people shouldn't be spending their money,"
Reid said. "To truly reenergize our economy, we need people to travel to Las Vegas. I would much
rather tourists and business travelers spend their money in Las Vegas than spend it overseas."
Sen. John Ensign said he planned on calling
Obama to ask for an apology since his words have caused damage which the city really can't afford in this unstable economy.
"President Obama has become quite comfortable
criticizing Las Vegas,"
Ensign said in a statement. "Unfortunately, I think that he has failed to grasp
the weight that his words carry. As a result of his irresponsible comment just
last year, countless companies and federal agencies canceled their conventions
at Las Vegas
hotels, costing these hotels and our city millions of dollars. Once again he
has threatened the struggling economy of Las
Vegas. I certainly hope that companies across this
country understand that his comments are simply cavalier assumptions about a
city that offers dollar for dollar the best rates in the country."
Gov. Jim Gibbons was similarly outraged,
declaring, "How dare he insult any American city...This is another slap in the
face of the hard-working families of Nevada."
Gibbons brings up a good point, which was
reiterated by Rep. Dina Titus: that the true victims of Obama's remarks are the
thousands of citizens who make their living off the tourist industry and are
the very "Main Street"
people Obama was elected on the platform of representing and protecting.
"I want the president to straighten this out," Goodman
said. "If not, he's not welcome in my city, as far as I'm concerned. He's
not our friend. I don't know about people in Nevada,
but in Las Vegas,
he's sure not our friend."
Goodman is unashamed of his vehement protection of Las Vegas and doesn't care if his backlash at the President will garner his own criticism.
"What? Little weenies are going to criticize me?
Forgetaboutit. I could care less about that," he said. "I'm the
mayor, I'm trying to protect Las Vegas.
And I don't care what these little pundits say."
Part of this ordeal is, undoubtedly, the fault of Las Vegas itself.
Obama was playing off the
stereotype of Vegas that is so pervasive not only does most of the country
believe it, but it is one that extends beyond the boundaries of North
America.
The stereotype of Las
Vegas as a hotspot for self-indulgence and excess is
one that was crafted and sold by the city as a way of branding itself and
bringing in tourism. It's just a shame that the President, who after twenty
visits to Vegas during his campaign, has still let this stereotype cloud his
mind from the truth.
"It's not a true junket city. It's not
the Caribbean or Santa Barbara,"
said UNLV sociologist Rob Lang. "If you've been at a giant convention here for
electronics or homebuilders or shopping centers, you know this is business, and
people are making deals and working hard."
Hopefully, Obama has learned his lesson
and will learn to bite his tongue, because, as we've seen, Vegas does bite back.